Thomas Sowell nails Obamanian class warfare and the Elizabeth Warren rant. We once admired achievement, hard work and perseverance.
Somewhere along the way, all that changed. Today, the very concept of
achievement is de-emphasized and sometimes attacked. Following in the
footsteps of Barack Obama, Professor Elizabeth Warren of Harvard has
made the downgrading of high achievers the centerpiece of her election
campaign against Senator Scott Brown.
To cheering audiences, Professor Warren says, “there is nobody in
this country who got rich on his own. Nobody. You build a factory out
there, good for you, but I want to be clear. You moved your goods to
market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers that the
rest of us paid to educate.”
Do the people who cheer this kind of talk bother to stop and think through what she is saying?
Demonizing success is especially dishonest at a time when high earners bear the largest share of the tax burden ever.
At a time when a small fraction of high-income taxpayers pay the vast
majority of all the taxes collected, it is sheer chutzpah to depict
high-income earners as somehow subsidized by “the rest of us,” whether
through paying for the building of roads or the educating of the young. Since everybody else uses the roads and the schools, why should high
achievers be expected to feel like freeloaders who owe still more to the
government, because schools and roads are among the things that
facilitate their work? According to Elizabeth Warren, it’s because it is
part of an “underlying social contract.
And here's the kicker:
Conjuring up some mythical agreement that nobody saw, much less signed, is an old ploy of the Left...Whatever policy [they] happened to favor was magically
transformed by rhetoric into a “promise” that American society was
supposed to have made — and, implicitly, that American taxpayers should
be forced to pay for.
No comments:
Post a Comment