Carol Platt Liebau laughs at all the bizarre efforts by lefty cheerleaders to explain BO's pathetic debate performance (hat tip to
Betsy). She nails it, especially for pointing out how nasty our slanderer-in-chief is:
as someone who knew Obama in law school, and now has observed his
presidency, his avoidance of debate does seem to conform to a pattern.
It has nothing to do with a gentlemanly or conciliatory reluctance to
be aggressive. Rather, it has everything to do with a reluctance to be
aggressive when his opponent is present -- where he can experience some
push back from the person he's demonizing, and where his lack of
preparation or knowledge can reveal him as foolish. (Hence, perhaps, the "decorous courtesy" in face to face encounters, where might prompt a more vigorous blowback.)
Think about it. There's never seen such a trash-talking campaigner
-- one who accuses his opponent of lying, who allows his campaign to
call Romney a murderer and a felon, one who calls Americans with whom he
disagrees "fat cats," or accuses doctors of performing unnecessary
surgeries. He has no problem going after Romney the day after the
debate, when he's no longer there face-to-face, and when Obama's trusty
teleprompter is back. In fact, President Obama is one of the least
gentlemanly and most uncivil men to occupy the Oval Office -- certainly
publicly (Richard Nixon's private utterances put him in the running,
too).
Notice that the only time Obama apparently shrinks from throwing a
punch is when his opponent can punch back. That's not a guy who's just
too "conciliatory" to get down and dirty -- that's a guy who's afraid to get down and dirty when it means he might have to suffer the consequences.
In my book, that's what's known as a "bully" -- full of big talk in
the locker room (or on Letterman) . . . but considerably less cocky when
he actually has to address his opponent face to face, unprotected by
the friendly aid of the MSM.
No comments:
Post a Comment