Gosh. It appears that the critical work that global warmists use to try to present some scientific veneer for their claims of catastrophic sensitivity to CO2 contains some basic statistics screwups. Hmmm, where have we seen this show before?
Here is the original Nic Lewis post at Climate Audit which led to the explanations provided in several Bishop Hill posts which I noted earlier today.
Wouldn't it be nice if scientists had someone check their work for basic errors before we spend hundreds of billions of dollars? Wouldn't it be nice if they were transparent in providing data and code so the public could check? I know, we all once thought that such simple things were essential to the very core of doing science. Silly us.